Difference between revisions of "Pathloss 5.1 - Revision history"
(Created page with "== Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector bu...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 == | ||
== Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 == | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 5 April 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016
Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016
Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
